(March 17, 1920 – August 15, 1975) was a Bengali politician and the founding leader of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, generally considered in the country as the father of the Bangladeshi nation. He headed the Awami League, served as the first President of Bangladesh  and later became its Prime Minister. He is popularly referred to as Sheikh Mujib, and with the honorary title of Bangabandhu (বঙ্গবন্ধু Bôngobondhu, "Friend of Bengal"). His eldest daughter Sheikh Hasina Wajed is the present leader of the Awami League and the current Prime Minister of Bangladesh.
A  student political leader, Mujib rose in East Pakistani politics and  within the ranks of the Awami League as a charismatic and forceful  orator. An advocate of socialism,  Mujib became popular for his leadership against the ethnic and  institutional discrimination of Bengalis. He demanded increased  provincial autonomy, and became a fierce opponent of the military rule  ofAyub Khan. At the heightening of sectional tensions, Mujib outlined a 6-point autonomy plan, which was seen as separatism in West Pakistan. He was tried in 1968 for allegedly conspiring with the Indian government but  was not found guilty. Despite leading his party to a major victory in  the 1970 elections, Mujib was not invited to form the government
The Life and Death of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman
 SHEIKH MUJIB: TRIUMPH AND TRAGEDY : S. A. Karim.
SHEIKH MUJIB: TRIUMPH AND TRAGEDY : S. A. Karim.This,  surprisingly, is the first biography in English of Sheikh Mujibur  Rahman, the founder of Bangladesh, even though more 30 years have passed  since he was assassinated in a bloody military coup on August 15, 1975.  Known to most Bangladeshis as Bangabandhu, or friend of Bengal, a title  bestowed on him by acclamation in a mammoth public meeting in Dhaka on  22 February, 1969, he was truly a man of the people, someone who had  made the cause of his countrymen and women his own through endless  trials and tribulations. And yet he had been assassinated in the country  he had championed ceaselessly soon after it became independent. Also,  he had disillusioned quite a few people in record time in governing it.  How did he win the hearts of his people as “the father of the nation”  and secure a place in their history as Gandhi did in India or Jinnah did  in Pakistan? What caused him to slide in their esteem? But also, what  was he like as a human being as well as a leader? And now that three  decades have passed since his death, is it possible to arrive at a real  estimate of the man and his achievements?
It  is to S. A. Karim’s credit that he has tried to raise these questions  implicitly and explicitly and answer them succinctly and objectively in  his biography, Sheikh Mujib: Triumph and Tragedy. Drawing on published  sources, a few interviews with people who knew Sheikh Mujibur Rahman,  his own encounters with him as the first Foreign Secretary of  independent Bangladesh, Karim has striven to give a balanced, accurate,  and thoughtful portrait of the man. His conclusion is that he was a  leader whose triumph was on a heroic scale but whose ending was, at the  very least, tragic.
From  this point onwards, there was no stopping Mujib, except by confinement  in jail. As Pakistani politics more and more became the preserve of the  military, as the military conspired with a few West and East Pakistani  politicians and bureaucrats to deprive Pakistan of democracy, and as the  numerically superior Bengalis of East Pakistan found themselves  increasingly thrust out of power, Mujib was in the thick of the action  to wrest back the rights of his people through a secular, organized, and  democratic movement, even as a succession of military generals  attempted to rule Pakistan through martial law. In and out of jail in  the latter half of the 1950s and throughout the 1960s, Mujib became  convinced that Pakistan was a dead end for his people and that a way out  of the clutches of the military-bureaucratic coalition that was ruling  Pakistan at this time was needed urgently. In his desperation,  Mujib even thought of seeking the help of India. Karim suggests that it  could have been his admiration for Subhas Bose that led Mujib to take a  secret trip to Agartala in January 1963 where he met Satindranath Sinha,  the Chief Minister of Tripura, to see if Indian assistance would be  forthcoming for a separatist movement. But according to Sinha, whom  Karim quotes without citing the source, Nehru was not interested and the  trip was inconsequential. It is ironic, then, that it was for a trip to  Agartola that he never took that the Pakistani government would try him  for treason in what has come to be known as the Agartola Conspiracy  case in 1967. Unfortunately for them, the effort at concocting a  conspiracy backfired, for not only were they unable to sustain their  case in front of the special tribunal that was set up for the purpose,  they were also forced to release Mujib in the face of increasingly  violent agitation against them in both wings of Pakistan. Indeed, the  Pakistani dictator of the period, Ayub Khan, was forced to resign, and  Mujib left the jail triumphantly in 22 February 1969, widely  acknowledged by this time in his part of Pakistan as the man most suited  to lead it forward to autonomy and prosperity. The  next two years saw Mujib at his best: inspiring his people through  fiery speeches in countless meetings, seemingly inexhaustible energy,  and an indomitable will. He kept highlighting his party’s demand for  complete autonomy in East Pakistan until the message went home: in the  elections held in December, 1970, the Awami League won 167 of the 169  seats in the province. But Mujib, committed to negotiations through  democratic channels, was mistaken in his assumption that the Pakistani  generals and Zulfiquer Bhutto, the clear winner in West Pakistan, were  going to hand over power to his party merely because it had a clear  majority when it was bent on getting the maximum autonomy conceivable  for East Pakistanis.
 In  fact, Yahya Khan, the general who replaced Ayub Khan, colluded with  Bhutto to postpone the March 3, 1971 opening of the National Assembly.  The result was a spontaneous and angry civil disobedience movement in  East Pakistan which, in effect, negated the Pakistani state, making  Mujib the de facto ruler of East Pakistan. As if to show that he was  worthy of the part, Mujib gave what is undoubtedly his finest speech to  his people on 7 March, stopping just short of independence, but claiming  self-rule in almost all matters. Yahya Khan’s response, once again was  to scheme with Bhutto, and make a show of negotiations, bent as they  were on keeping West Pakistan dominant in deciding the future of  Pakistan. And so Mujib and his party kept negotiating with Yahya and  Bhutto in good faith, even as the Pakistani army prepared themselves for  a crackdown that would decisively and brutally neutralize Mujib and his  party and ensure perpetuation of their hegemonic rule.The date  in which the Pakistani army moved to destroy Mujib and thwart the  Bengali desire for complete autonomy was the night of March 25. As far  as Karim is concerned, Mujib and his party leaders had “ignored signs of  the gathering storm” and thus an unsuspecting, unprepared people were  brutalized, the movement for autonomy stunned, and Mujib himself  captured. Here again Karim is critical of Mujib’s decision to let  himself be arrested to deflect the Pakistan army from wrecking havoc in  his country, Mujib, reportedly, told his followers who wanted him to  flee, “If I leave my house (Pakistani) raiders are going to massacre the  people of Dhaka. I don’t want my people to be killed on my account”,  but his decision did not prevent genocide; on the contrary, it exposed  his people to the wrath of the Pakistan army.
In  fact, Yahya Khan, the general who replaced Ayub Khan, colluded with  Bhutto to postpone the March 3, 1971 opening of the National Assembly.  The result was a spontaneous and angry civil disobedience movement in  East Pakistan which, in effect, negated the Pakistani state, making  Mujib the de facto ruler of East Pakistan. As if to show that he was  worthy of the part, Mujib gave what is undoubtedly his finest speech to  his people on 7 March, stopping just short of independence, but claiming  self-rule in almost all matters. Yahya Khan’s response, once again was  to scheme with Bhutto, and make a show of negotiations, bent as they  were on keeping West Pakistan dominant in deciding the future of  Pakistan. And so Mujib and his party kept negotiating with Yahya and  Bhutto in good faith, even as the Pakistani army prepared themselves for  a crackdown that would decisively and brutally neutralize Mujib and his  party and ensure perpetuation of their hegemonic rule.The date  in which the Pakistani army moved to destroy Mujib and thwart the  Bengali desire for complete autonomy was the night of March 25. As far  as Karim is concerned, Mujib and his party leaders had “ignored signs of  the gathering storm” and thus an unsuspecting, unprepared people were  brutalized, the movement for autonomy stunned, and Mujib himself  captured. Here again Karim is critical of Mujib’s decision to let  himself be arrested to deflect the Pakistan army from wrecking havoc in  his country, Mujib, reportedly, told his followers who wanted him to  flee, “If I leave my house (Pakistani) raiders are going to massacre the  people of Dhaka. I don’t want my people to be killed on my account”,  but his decision did not prevent genocide; on the contrary, it exposed  his people to the wrath of the Pakistan army.  While  the Pakistani army went on the rampage, Mujib himself was taken to  prisons in West Pakistan where he underwent a trial at the end of which  he was found guilty of trying to break up Pakistan and was awarded the  sentence of death by hanging. Meanwhile, Bengali troops who had  defected, political activists of various parties, and students and  refugees who had fled to India came together to organize a guerilla  campaign against the Pakistani army and to launch a war that would  liberate their country. Inevitably, India was drawn into the conflict,  and on December 16, 1971, the Pakistani army in East Pakistan  surrendered in Dhaka to the combined Indian and Bangladesh forces. This  was how Bangladesh was born after nine blood-soaked months. With the  Pakistani army in disgrace, and Bhutto calling the cards, and in the  face of international pressure, Mujib was released from jail and flown  back to Dhaka via London in a RAF plane on 9 January 1972. Mujib’s  homecoming marked the most triumphant moment of his career as a  politician who had worked steadfastly and whole-heartedly for his  people. But the next few years saw him sliding in popularity and having a  torrid time coping with the innumerable problems facing a poor nation  that had been denuded for over two decades by the West Pakistanis and  that had hemorrhaged steadily for nine months. The prescriptions that he  got from his advisers in the Planning Commission, inclement weather  conditions that led to a terrible famine in 1974, rising global oil  prices, growing lawlessness, his unwillingness or disinclination to be  firm with party men and women and relatives who were clamoring for  benefits and sinecures, underground movements that appeared to be  gathering momentum and threatening the state, all appeared to conspire  to show Mujib as unable to cope with the responsibility of steering a  nation from political independence to peace, stability, and prosperity.
While  the Pakistani army went on the rampage, Mujib himself was taken to  prisons in West Pakistan where he underwent a trial at the end of which  he was found guilty of trying to break up Pakistan and was awarded the  sentence of death by hanging. Meanwhile, Bengali troops who had  defected, political activists of various parties, and students and  refugees who had fled to India came together to organize a guerilla  campaign against the Pakistani army and to launch a war that would  liberate their country. Inevitably, India was drawn into the conflict,  and on December 16, 1971, the Pakistani army in East Pakistan  surrendered in Dhaka to the combined Indian and Bangladesh forces. This  was how Bangladesh was born after nine blood-soaked months. With the  Pakistani army in disgrace, and Bhutto calling the cards, and in the  face of international pressure, Mujib was released from jail and flown  back to Dhaka via London in a RAF plane on 9 January 1972. Mujib’s  homecoming marked the most triumphant moment of his career as a  politician who had worked steadfastly and whole-heartedly for his  people. But the next few years saw him sliding in popularity and having a  torrid time coping with the innumerable problems facing a poor nation  that had been denuded for over two decades by the West Pakistanis and  that had hemorrhaged steadily for nine months. The prescriptions that he  got from his advisers in the Planning Commission, inclement weather  conditions that led to a terrible famine in 1974, rising global oil  prices, growing lawlessness, his unwillingness or disinclination to be  firm with party men and women and relatives who were clamoring for  benefits and sinecures, underground movements that appeared to be  gathering momentum and threatening the state, all appeared to conspire  to show Mujib as unable to cope with the responsibility of steering a  nation from political independence to peace, stability, and prosperity.The  stage was set, in other words, for triumph to turn into tragedy. The  man who had staked his life repeatedly for democracy now attempted to  create a one party state, proscribe newspapers, and stifle dissent. A  radical leader died mysteriously while in police custody. Members of  Mujib’s extended family suddenly began to assume more and more power.  People who had shown total devotion to him and Bangladesh like Tajuddin  Ahmed was dropped and sycophants were promoted to important positions.  The air in Dhaka was rife with rumors of conspiracies and coups but  Mujib chose to ignore them, convinced that the people he loved and had  been ready to die for would never harbor conspirators against him. And  so it was that he rendered himself completely vulnerable and was  murdered by some adventurous, resentful, and ambitious military men in  the early hours of August 15, 1975. Karim’s verdict on Mujib’s  rise to fame and the darkening world in which he died and his assessment  of his subject’s personality, career and contribution to Bangladesh is  surely sound. His Mujib is a gracious and compassionate person, generous  almost to a fault. His love for his people and willingness to sacrifice  himself for them is never in doubt. He had more or less  “single-handedly” spearheaded the movement for Bangladesh in its  climactic phase and until his incarceration in 1971. And he had  struggled to cope with extremely difficult situations the best he could  till desperation forced him to adopt undemocratic measures. He was, in  short, a “tragic hero” flawed and yet great and even grand.
S.  A, Karim’s Sheikh Mujib: Triumph and Tragedy seems to have been written  at leisure; the consequence is that it is even-paced, well-organized  and sedate. He strives to be balanced and objective in his presentation  and he writes out of a conviction that as a biographer he must be  committed to presenting his subject truthfully and adequately. He has  also tried to come up with a book that will be read by many and to that  end he has decided not to overload it with “notes and references”.
 It  must be said though that Karim’s book is not the “comprehensive  biography” he claims it to be in his Preface. For one thing, he spends  far too much time sketching in the background and often loses sight of  his subject in dealing with the historical contexts. At times, a few  chapters might go by without any reference to Mujib and in scores of  chapters he makes only a fleeting appearance. Indeed, one may  occasionally even be mislead into thinking that one is reading a  political history of Bangladesh where Mujib is the main actor and not  his biography. Moreover, Karim appears to have not realized that a  biographer’s task includes looking at archival material and contemporary  newspaper reports and tracking down unpublished written sources as well  as perusing published books and documents. He could have, for example,  tried to include excerpts from the many speeches Mujib gave on public  occasions that have been surely recorded in parliamentary proceedings;  talked to his admirers, tracked his path to power doggedly instead of  spending most of his time giving sketches of the political history of  East Pakistan. But what appears to be the singular defect of this  biography is Karim’s reluctance to imagine himself into positions,  crises and situations Mujib had to negotiate or to come close to his  subject through what Keats had once characterized as “negative  capability”. In his introduction to his incomparable biography of Samuel  Johnson, James Boswell had claimed that the “more perfect mode of  writing any man’s life” involved “not only relating all the most  important events of it in order, but interweaving” it with the subject’s  words and thought till “mankind are enabled to see him live”. In his  conclusion, too, Boswell had felt with satisfaction that in his book the  character of the great man had been “so developed “in the course of his  work “that those who have honored it with a perusal, may be considered  as well acquainted with him”. Karim follows Mujib from a great distance  and almost never allows him to speak for himself. There is little or no  effort to see Mujib from up close and there is definitely no attempt to  get into his mind. The result is a biography that does not make us “see  him live” and think and feel and this is a pity for by all accounts  Mujib was a passionate, loving and caring man. Karim tries to make a  virtue out of detachment and objectivity not realizing that what he  needed to do was creatively represent the thoughts and emotions of a man  who was overpowering because of his love for his people and conviction  about what was right for them.
It  must be said though that Karim’s book is not the “comprehensive  biography” he claims it to be in his Preface. For one thing, he spends  far too much time sketching in the background and often loses sight of  his subject in dealing with the historical contexts. At times, a few  chapters might go by without any reference to Mujib and in scores of  chapters he makes only a fleeting appearance. Indeed, one may  occasionally even be mislead into thinking that one is reading a  political history of Bangladesh where Mujib is the main actor and not  his biography. Moreover, Karim appears to have not realized that a  biographer’s task includes looking at archival material and contemporary  newspaper reports and tracking down unpublished written sources as well  as perusing published books and documents. He could have, for example,  tried to include excerpts from the many speeches Mujib gave on public  occasions that have been surely recorded in parliamentary proceedings;  talked to his admirers, tracked his path to power doggedly instead of  spending most of his time giving sketches of the political history of  East Pakistan. But what appears to be the singular defect of this  biography is Karim’s reluctance to imagine himself into positions,  crises and situations Mujib had to negotiate or to come close to his  subject through what Keats had once characterized as “negative  capability”. In his introduction to his incomparable biography of Samuel  Johnson, James Boswell had claimed that the “more perfect mode of  writing any man’s life” involved “not only relating all the most  important events of it in order, but interweaving” it with the subject’s  words and thought till “mankind are enabled to see him live”. In his  conclusion, too, Boswell had felt with satisfaction that in his book the  character of the great man had been “so developed “in the course of his  work “that those who have honored it with a perusal, may be considered  as well acquainted with him”. Karim follows Mujib from a great distance  and almost never allows him to speak for himself. There is little or no  effort to see Mujib from up close and there is definitely no attempt to  get into his mind. The result is a biography that does not make us “see  him live” and think and feel and this is a pity for by all accounts  Mujib was a passionate, loving and caring man. Karim tries to make a  virtue out of detachment and objectivity not realizing that what he  needed to do was creatively represent the thoughts and emotions of a man  who was overpowering because of his love for his people and conviction  about what was right for them.Nevertheless,  there is a lot to be thankful for in Karim’s Sheikh Mujib: Triumph and  Tragedy. At the very least, a sensible effort has been made to present  the life of a great and generous even if flawed leader; surely others  will now follow to give us a more intimate, imaginative, intensely  realized and fuller portrait of the father of Bangladesh and the friend  of all Bengalis everywhere. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman deserves  no less!May 21, 2006                                Fakrul Alam is on leave from the University of Dhaka and now teaches English at East West University, Bangladesh.
 







 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment